Re: What Software to Type Math In?


Herman Rubin <hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marc Olschok <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Herman Rubin <hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
If there is somebody else available who can take care of the typesetting
aspect of your document, you may as well say "I just want to type it
quickly, the _final_appearance_ of the document is not _my_ business".
And of course this makes sense. The same applies, if the final appearance
does not matter as such, e.g. in a personal not[e] for yourself.
(even in this case, I would feel _very_ uncomfortable with a format that
is not plain text and where readability depends on the existence of a
particular version of a particular software)

What is "plain text"?

Something that I can process with simple editors and other text-tools across
a variety of different platforms, independent of the particular fonts or
encodings available. Something I can e-mail or post in newsgroups without
having to assume any special capabilities on the part of other readers.
In short: I want to be able to use ed in a dumb terminal, if needed.
I admit that such a notion of "plain text" is a moving target: right now
it is still ASCII for me; in the near future, when all those tools will
have migrated, it will perhaps be Unicode.

To me, mixing Latin, Greek, and
Cyrillic characters in a text is "plain text". Put in
subscripts and superscripts with full or reduced size
and crude "half-spacing", and recognizable mathematical
symbols, and you have LOTS of power. I want to be able
to put the characters on the screen exactly where I want
them, and I want it to be read by a fixed-width "editor"
which has the relevant fonts. I would settle for a
"super-ASCII" with the "gazillions" of characters.

You want an Unicode-capable editor.


The old Apples has a way to put the typewriter decoding for
a particular font in a corner of the screen. One did not
have to mouse the character in, but knew how to type it.

And one needed an Apple to begin with.


If instead, the final appearance matters and can not be delegated to
somebody else, one may as well start right away with the real thing.
As far as I could see, this is to be the situation of the OP.

In many cases, fixed width typing is much easier to read
than typeset material.

As others already pointed out, there is no antagonism between 'typesetting'
and 'fixed width type'. Whether fixed witdh is easier to read depends
on the material and the medium.


Another advantage of at typewriter rather than a typesetter
is that the author has easy control of line breaks. Also,
fixed width fonts are necessary for easy communication.
This goes completely against the typesetting mentality.

Depending on the final format it might also go completely against
the idea of readability. Nobody suggested that you typeset your e-mail.

I still use Berkeley mail for sending email or responding.
The email with this newsreader is like that as well. Email
sent by many of the fancier mailers lacks line breaks, and
can be difficult to handle.

Sure. The same point could be made against special fonts in mail.
Compare "Jiří visited Würzburg" to "Ji\v{r}\'\i\ visited W\"urzburg".
Observe, that I can type the left version directly into LaTeX.


In fact, easy documentation depends on plain text format.
This is one of the reasons for using TeX and LaTeX, even if all the
fine points of typesetting are ignored.

I am asking for a plain text format, with a huge character
set. This is feasible. TeX and LaTeX use plain text
CHARACTERS, but not a plain text FORMAT.

There are two issues here.

One is your need for an editor able to handle all these fonts in a
coherent way. The question of typesetting does not even enter here.

The other is the question, whether TeX or LaTeX could handle such
texts as input. For TeX the answer is most likely 'no' since it is
meant to be frozen. However, LaTeX is acively developed further and
it might well be able to handle this in the fuuture, like it already
can for several encodings, as pointed out in the example above.

Marc
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What Software to Type Math In?
    ... characters when 10 will do is not a good idea. ... replace fonts; also, the user could even modify characters in ... division of labour in the process of typesetting your document. ... What is "plain text"? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Certificates
    ... Is there any particular package anyone would recommend for typesetting ... I could use plain latex). ...
    (comp.text.tex)
  • Re: Typesetting chess books
    ... When you read a chess book, do you prefer small ... the textmoves (the real game moves) to be typeset as this: ... had download my fonts and ran the demo book you could appreciate that. ... Of course not all is that simple in typesetting, e.g, you cannot cut a ...
    (rec.games.chess.misc)
  • Re: forth on maglev rails?
    ... extensions should be separated. ... The user then should switch over to meta-language mode. ... The meta-language is basically a typesetting language. ... I dont think fonts are the problem today. ...
    (comp.lang.forth)
  • Re: Strange Characters When Viewing Outlook Express messages
    ... Encoding (not fonts) controls everything in an email message. ... When reading the message in OE, the message's format (i.e., Plain Text; RichText; HTML) plays a role, too...as does proprietary formatting. ... OE simply does not play nicely with all encoding and formatting...and it was never designed to do so. ... but do not understand the CP Regional and Language options settings. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)