Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- From: "Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Feb 2006 15:10:15 -0800
Chris Thompson wrote:
In article <1138602995.032726.74020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Proginoskes <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Minus XVII wrote:
I think it's just his comprehension of english,
taht gets him no end of trouble in satisfying neccesity and/
or sufficiency, or even defining the problem at first reading.
He grew up in the United States and learned English. If he had just
gotten off the boat, he'd have an excuse. As it is, he's just as
stubborn as a dachshund.
What we need are badgers that can bite back _hard_. So far he seems
to have suffered only minor flesh wounds.
Hmmm ... Maybe we should cross-post this discussion to
sci.genetics-engineering.monsters.
--- Christopher Heckman
P.S. BTW, I got the phrase "stubborn as a dachshund" from _The
Manchurian Candidate_. And having lived in a family which had 5 of
them, at various times, I could see the humor.
.
- References:
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- From: Chris Thompson
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Prev by Date: Re: Laplace transform problem
- Next by Date: Re: determining sqrt(2)..
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Next by thread: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Index(es):