Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: "Jiri Lebl" <jirka@xxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Feb 2006 09:05:03 -0800
Han de Bruijn wrote:
Virgil wrote:
Asking whether any physically derived function is continuous at any
point you have yourself just proved to be impossible to answer, so that
continuity of functions is NEVER observable, and therefore must be
outlawed by HdB's anti-mathematicism.
Continuity means the following: a function f(x) is continuous in a iff
lim f(x) = f(a)
x->a
This is materialized into: |x - a| < delta ==> |f(x) - f(a)| < eps
So if we have a sensor that measures x within a distance delta from a ,
then f(x) will be measured as within a distance eps from f(a) . Delta
and eps are the uncertainities. What is "NEVER observable" about this?
Good thing you have quantifier dyslexia, hence you'll never figure it
out.
Jiri
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- References:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: david petry
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: david petry
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Prev by Date: Re: Reasoning problem.
- Next by Date: Re: books on random process, brownian motion etc ..
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|