Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:16:30 -0500
Han de Bruijn said:
Tony Orlow wrote:Maybe you want to come fight Virgil and Tribble with me in Well Ordering the
[ .. snip .. ] Oh, well. I think we agree that some things can be thought of
as, in one way continuous, and in another, discrete. Everything has a wave
nature, and a particle nature.
Yes, I think we both agree on _that_.
Han de Bruijn
Reals. They seem to hate my T-riffic number system, and the concept of the
reals as a sequence of infinitesimally differing values, but it's all fitting
together, bit by bit, into quite a theory. When they finally come out of that
garden of theirs and look back, all they'll see is a cave, but there will be
tea and cookies waiting, and sunglasses for that transition period. Haha. :)
Is 1/x continuous? Sure, if oo=-oo.
--
Smiles,
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- References:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: david petry
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Prev by Date: Re: Factoraization of n! as power of primes
- Next by Date: Re: Monotone+nonzero Derivative--> cts deriv? strictly monotone interval?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|