Re: Gauss's comment
- From: larryhammick@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Feb 2006 10:33:18 -0800
Yes, I think he meant "true without referring to Euler's relation."Probably true IMO. But the equation
e^(i.pi) + 1 = 0
does have a mystic appeal. Maybe therefore it was the topic of small
talk somewhere, to which Gauss made a possibly facetious contribution.
But I dunno. I wasn't present.
The Grandeur of Ghosts
When I have heard small talk about great men
I light my two candles; climb to bed; then
Consider what was said; and put aside
What Such-a-one remarked, and Someone-else replied.
They have spoken lightly of my deathless friends,
(Lamps for my gloom, hands guiding where I stumble,)
Quoting, for shallow conversational ends,
What Shelley shrilled, what Blake once wildly muttered. . . .
How can they use such names and be not humble ?
I have sat silent; angry at what they uttered.
The dead bequeathed them life; the dead have said
What these can only memorise and mumble.
-- Siegfried Sassoon
.
- References:
- Gauss's comment
- From: Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
- Re: Gauss's comment
- From: pauldepstein
- Gauss's comment
- Prev by Date: Re: Monotone+nonzero Derivative--> cts deriv? strictly monotone interval?
- Next by Date: The Euler Equation: What does "e" have to do with sine & cosine?
- Previous by thread: Re: Gauss's comment
- Next by thread: Re: Gauss's comment
- Index(es):