Re: Online poker RNG...
- From: "Gerry" <gerald_helmling@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Feb 2006 11:38:56 -0800
I do appreciate the answers. (I appreciate the advice about colllusion,
too, btw, although, as a professional player, I already am aware of it
as a possibility online and in B&M casinos -- actually more in the
latter, for many reasons -- and happen to agree with Bill's (If I'm
right, Henry quoted Bill's blog.) assessment.)
I still don't understand this, though: what, specifically, has changed
since the publication of the 1999 article? From a mathemetical
perspective, I mean. (That's why I posted here.) I know I'm asking for
expert advice in lay terms, which is a tough nut to crack, but if one
you can do that, I'd appreciate it. BTW: For sale online are the hand
histories of almost every player at almost every site. A cheater would
have access to these hand histories in order to seed a database with
millions of hands in an effort to reverse-compile the algorithm, no?
Seems to be what pokerrng.com claims, and THAT is what I worry about...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Online poker RNG...
- From: James Waldby
- Re: Online poker RNG...
- From: richard.blankman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Online poker RNG...
- References:
- Online poker RNG...
- From: Gerry
- Re: Online poker RNG...
- From: Henry
- Online poker RNG...
- Prev by Date: Re: creating a right angled triangle.
- Next by Date: Re: Probability question
- Previous by thread: Re: Online poker RNG...
- Next by thread: Re: Online poker RNG...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|