Re: Fourier Transform, Smooth Functions
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:52:28 -0600
On 27 Feb 2006 13:13:14 -0800, "irchans" <infinitgames@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi David,
I think I understand the both the argument that p=1 is impossible
and the exposition of Petry's example, but I still want to write out
all the details for myself.
Ok.
I just started reading Rudin's section on
quasi-analytic functions (Denjoy-Carleman theorem) and I'm sure it will
help me understand the problem more deeply. Thank you very much for
the reference!
It's a worthwhile theorem, but I don't think that it settles the
question you asked. At least I don't see how it does:
Assume that g(s) is of order exp(-|s|^p), where p < 1. That implies
bounds on the absolute value of the derivatives f^(n). The D-C
theorem says that the class of all f satisfying those bounds is
not quasi-analytic, hence contains a function F with compact
support. But I don't see how it follows that the Fourier transform
of F is of order exp(-|s|^p).
Cheers,
Irchans
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- References:
- Fourier Transform, Smooth Functions
- From: irchans
- Re: Fourier Transform, Smooth Functions
- From: david petry
- Re: Fourier Transform, Smooth Functions
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Fourier Transform, Smooth Functions
- From: irchans
- Re: Fourier Transform, Smooth Functions
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Fourier Transform, Smooth Functions
- From: irchans
- Fourier Transform, Smooth Functions
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyone interested in being paid to find a solution to a commercial problem?
- Next by Date: Re: Exchange order of integration and summation
- Previous by thread: Re: Fourier Transform, Smooth Functions
- Next by thread: Dumb question (work out the formula for my trend)
- Index(es):