Re: Integer-Valued Polynomials
- From: Maury Barbato <mauriziobarbato@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:51:35 EST
Two remarks:
Maury Barbato wrote:
Hello,those
let D be a domain, K its quotient field, and F an
extension field of K. The ring of integer-valued
polynomials in n indetermintes over D consists of
polynomials in K[x_1,...,x_n] which give a value inD
for every argument in D^n (standard definition).same
What happens if we replace K[x_1,...,x_n] with
F[x_1,...,x_n] in this definition? Do we obtain the
set of polynomials? What if D=Z, K=Q and F=C?
Thank you very mauch for your ideas.
Hi, Maury:
I don't believe we do pick anything "extra" in
polynomials
over the extension field K, by an interpolation
argument.
First let us note that one can have a
"integer-valued"
polynomial which is not simply integer coefficients:
f(x) = x(x+1)/2
for example. However a polynomial with coefficients
in
(for example) the complex field C and integer-valued
for all arguments in Z must agree with a polynomial
of
equal degree with coefficients in Q (e.g. constructed
by Newton divided differences) on all arguments Z,
and hence be identical to that polynomial over Q.
regards, chip
(I)Newton method works also for several
variables and for general fields?
(II) Even if it works, it can't be very useful. How could
you apply it, to use later the "Identity Polynomials
Principle"?
But your argument intended maybe to be only intuitive.
However, thank you very much for your help.
My Best Regards,
Maury
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Integer-Valued Polynomials
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: Integer-Valued Polynomials
- References:
- Re: Integer-Valued Polynomials
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: Integer-Valued Polynomials
- Prev by Date: Re: Integer-Valued Polynomials
- Next by Date: Re: LINEAR REGRESSION BY METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES
- Previous by thread: Re: Integer-Valued Polynomials
- Next by thread: Re: Integer-Valued Polynomials
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|