Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: "Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Mar 2006 00:04:24 -0800
Chip Eastham wrote:
bill wrote:
In one sense, "the Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT" says that there
exists a 4-colorable planar graph, to which you can add a vertex and
get a 5-colorable planar graph.
Perhaps this is hair splitting, but a minimal counterexample to the
four color conjecture (now theorem) involves a 4-colorable planar
graph to which one adds a vertex and gets a planar graph that is
not 4-colorable.
Every 4-colorable graph is also 5-colorable.
Literally a minimal counterexample would be a planar graph that is
not 4-colorable, but in which the removal of any vertex produces a
4-colorable (necessarily planar) graph.
That's what I meant when I said "[being a minimal counterexample to the
4CT] says a lot more than [there existing a 4-colorable planar graph,
where if you add a vertex, you get a 5-colorable planar graph]", bill.
--- Christopher Heckman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: bill
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- Prev by Date: Re: Three quesition about graph coloring
- Next by Date: Re: Diophantine problem from current MONTHLY
- Previous by thread: Re: Three quesition about graph coloring
- Next by thread: Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|