Re: universal element for the functor
- From: Meg Weiss <megweiss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:48:05 EST
In article
<15793250.1141316667274.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
forum.org>,
Meg Weiss <megweiss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Before you reply:
1. Mathforum does not insert line breaks properly;
please insert them
manually. Otherwise, your lines run off at the end
end of the screen
(and you can see in google how awfully they get
get displayed; it's
just as bad on text based newsreaders like mine.
2. When you reply, be sure to quote the message you
are replying
to. On mathforum this can be achieved by clicking
ing on the "Quote
original" button over the reply box.
A universal element for a functor F is an orderedpair (u,R)
consisting of a set R and an element u \in F(R) withfollowing
property:
I guess your functor goes from Set to some category
whose objects are
sets and whose arrows are functions on the underlying
sets...
To any set S and any element s \in F(S) there isexactly one function
h: R -> S with F(f)(u) = s.universal element
Let the functor F be F(S) = S x S, F(f) = f x f.
1) For 2 = {1, 2}, prove that (1,2) \in 2 x 2 is a
for the functor F.
Are you asking us to do your homework for you? To
explain the
question? To give a hint? What?
This is not a homework.
What have you managed? What are you confused about?
I wrote down
F(2) = {(1,1), (1,2), (2,1), (2,2)}
and try to define f as
f(1)= 1, f(2)=2
then I have problem.
Since we need a functor to be satisfied such that
F(f)(1) = (1,2) etc.
But
F(f)(1) = (f x f)(1) = f(1)xf(1) = (1,1)
F(f)(2) = (f x f)(2) = f(2)xf(2) = (2,2)
I don't get (1,2) where it should be.
How should I define f?
2) For 3 = {1, 2, 3}, prove that (1,2) \in 3 x 3 isnot a universal
element for the functor F
.
3) For 1 = {1}, prove that (1,1) \in 1 x 1 is notuniversal for F.
Likewise.
--
======================================================
================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================
================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: universal element for the functor
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: universal element for the functor
- References:
- Re: universal element for the functor
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: universal element for the functor
- Prev by Date: Re: Decomposable functions of independent variables
- Next by Date: Re: Representation of Analytic Functions
- Previous by thread: Re: universal element for the functor
- Next by thread: Re: universal element for the functor
- Index(es):