Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: "bill" <b92057@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Mar 2006 23:31:22 -0800
Proginoskes wrote:
bill wrote:
Proginoskes wrote:
Chip Eastham wrote:Thr principle of "Infinite Descent" is a valid method of mathematical
[...]
I'm confused what you are asking. "Minimal counterexample"
has a pretty clearly defined in meaning with respect to 4CT,
Or in any other proof. A graph G is a minimal counterexample to a
proposition T if
(1) T is not true for G, and
(2) If H has fewer vertices than G, then T is true for H.
The idea is similar to that of "Infinite Descent".
proof. A summary is given in;.
http://mcraefamily.com/MathHelp/PythagInfiniteDescent.htm
Generally, ID says that you start with the assumption of minimality and
then find
something smaller.. But in the long run, it is not nrcessary to start
with an assumption of minimality.
It seems to me that ID is a viable way of proving that an "mce to the
4CT" does not exist. Could I be wrong?
Yes.
But am I wrong?
--- Christopher Heckman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- References:
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: bill
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: bill
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: bill
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- Prev by Date: Better use of random number genator bits?
- Next by Date: Open loop procedure for PID tuning
- Previous by thread: Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- Next by thread: Re: Minimal Counter-example to the 4CT.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|