Re: infinity
- From: Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:49:25 -0700
In article <MPG.1e7f565a66ae99df98aac0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am not contradicting myself.
TO is constantly contradicting both himself and all of standard
mathematics in the vain attempt to puff himself up as being smarter that
people much smarter than he.
No, I am exploring ideas that can fix what many object to in set theory and
somewhat in logic, and you're heckling me, albeit in a sometimes helpful way.
That TO is not alert enough to notice how he contradicts both himself,
valid mathemmatics and valid logic is just one of his many problems.
.
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: What Is Funny Function Theory in Relation to Fusion
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|