Re: Adjunct site to sci.math needed
- From: Aron Palmer <aron.palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:04:38 EST
Nobody wants you to go away.Thanks, thats nice to know, I think you might be a bit optimistic about "Nobody" though.
If you want to bet some money, that would be
interesting.
Except we'd have to decide on a third-party referee.
Also the time limit of 24 hours is not appropriate,
because
the thing is not written coherently, it needs to be
deciphered.
Certainly willing to put some money on it, I think the hard part will be finding a third-party referee, willing to accept any suggestions you have though. I thought 24 hours would be enough for just the first part, but again willing to accept any suggestions.
(It's already happened at least once that I said
something
was wrong and you replied that that's not what you
meant...
if the bet is whether your paper is actually correct
as
written you've already conceded defeat.)
I think the bet would have to be wrong in a way that is not easily fixed, or similar.
If you are serious about cash, send me an email.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Adjunct site to sci.math needed
- From: Don Taylor
- Re: Adjunct site to sci.math needed
- References:
- Re: Adjunct site to sci.math needed
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Adjunct site to sci.math needed
- Prev by Date: Re: Reason for operator precedence
- Next by Date: Re: Logarithm of transfinite numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Adjunct site to sci.math needed
- Next by thread: Re: Adjunct site to sci.math needed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading