Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:06:12 -0700
In article <a3fd6$4416d974$82a1e228$21769@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David C. Ullrich wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:27:03 +0100, Han de Bruijn
<Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Calculus says that the outcome is 1 , while Probability Theory says
that, instead, we must do a dirty trick like this:
lim n.1/n = lim n ( lim 1/a ) = lim 0 = 0
n->oo n->oo a->oo n->oo
Nonsense.
Agreed.
Probability theory says no such thing.
I sincerely hope that you are right.
There is nothing in probability theory that requires any sort of
"continuity" in the discontinuous jump from choosing at random from a
finite sample space to choosing at random from an infinite one.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- References:
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Prev by Date: Re: Riemann Hypothesis
- Next by Date: Re: measurable functions and convergence
- Previous by thread: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Next by thread: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|