Re: Calculus XOR Probability

In article <b4dd4$4417ec3d$82a1e228$16583@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:

Calculus is fine. It acknowledges the notion of the infintiesimal.

That's what I asked to David Ullrich: is it indeed that infinitesimals
are recognized in standard mathematics? Or is that a forbidden area as
well? I mean, as a physicist, I have no problems with infinitesimals ..

"Forbidden"?

Mathematicians are a libertine, almost anarchistic group.
Nothing is really forbidden -- you're welcome to pursue whatever
you like. The only requirement is that you define your terms and
clarify your assumptions, and then proceed logically.

There are indeed perfectly logical and useful notions of "infinitesimals".
Emphasis on the plural here -- e.g. one definition of "infinitesimal" is
the set of nilpotent elements in the ring F[x]/(x^2) where F is
a field. I'll bet that's not the one you use in physics, but what
you DO have in mind I don't quite know.

One can build a theory of the calculus on a logical foundation which
involves another kind of infinitesimal; one can even prove a
transfer theorem which allows us to decide which results from
that theory apply to ordinary calculus over the real field.
Some folks prefer this approach, others start in measure theory, etc.
Different strokes for different folks. We're a "big tent" kind of group,
so that's OK.

Socks with sandals? Not a problem. Unkempt hair? Par for the course.
Unintentionally insults the host's spouse? Happens all the time.
None of these things is forbidden in mathematics. The only thing
that will get you thown out of the club is an insistence on vague
language and a refusal to accept logical deduction from clear
starting principles.

dave


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Would it matter if ZF was inconsistent?
    ... mathematics. ... always a bigger input than an algorithm can handle, ... aren't consistent with standard methods. ... infinitesimals that aren't) haven't been found to accomplish that. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability
    ... I mean, as a physicist, I have no problems with infinitesimals .. ... None of these things is forbidden in mathematics. ... Which is a capsule description of TO's operating principles. ... their decrees as to truths which they base on unfounded axioms. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... Rigorous approaches in mathematics essentially got its start in the ... Removing the unnecessary appeals to infinitesimals, ... cranks typically are unwilling to be disciplined in their ... >> Well-order the reals. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Is one-to-one mapping valid for comparing infinite-sized sets?
    ... May we not call them the ghosts of departed quantities? ... "infinitesimals" which his Grace referred to as "ghosts of departed ... The invention of the delta-epsilon definitions for limiting ... Did Weierstrass make a difference from which the mathematics benefited? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The Virgin Birth of Points
    ... Lester Zick wrote: ... produces infinitesimals not points. ... abhors philosophers and nobody actually practices modern math anyway ... business of mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)
Quantcast