Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Toni Lassila <toni@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:27:46 +0200
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:59:46 GMT, "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <22eg129j22u0g7ggvdp2pkbunb97bqg6ca@xxxxxxx> tlassila@xxxxxxxxx writes:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:36:19 +0100, Han de Bruijn
<Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK. _Are_ infinitesimals actually _defined_ in standard mathematics?
And if so, could you please tell me how?
Oddly enough, the treatment of calculus by rigorous notion of
infinitesimals is called 'nonstandard analysis', so I guess the answer
would strictly be 'no'.
Oddly enough Han does not like that either.
Perhaps it wasn't formulated by engineers? He seems to share a common
mindset for physicists/engineers that mathematicians are somehow
"enemies" or "annoying formalists" that contribute nothing and just
ruin things.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- References:
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Toni Lassila
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Prev by Date: Re: Logarithm of transfinite numbers
- Next by Date: A curious identity
- Previous by thread: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Next by thread: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Index(es):