Re: calc question ,
- From: "[Mr.] Lynn Kurtz" <kurtzDELETE-THIS@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:22:27 GMT
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:48:08 -0800, "quat" <spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am trying to show:
g(x,y,z) = I( g(xt, yt, zt), t, 0, 1) + I( [x*g_x(xt, yt, zt) + y*g_y(xt,
yt,zt) + z*g_z(xt, yt, zt)]t, t, 0, 1),
where I( f, x, 0, 1) means integral of f wrt x from 0 to 1. The book says
to differentiate t*g(xt, yt, zt) to see this. From the product rule I got:
(tg)' = g + tg'
If you write it out with all the arguments, what you have so far,
which is correct, is:
( tg(xt, yt, zt) )' = g(xt, yt, zt) + t g'(xt, yt, zt)
where ' denotes d/dt. Now you need to use the chain rule to expand
that last g'. Does that help?
--Lynn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: calc question ,
- From: quat
- Re: calc question ,
- References:
- calc question ,
- From: quat
- calc question ,
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH: Closer to the Edge of Distributive Factoring
- Next by Date: Re: Can classes be elements of classes?
- Previous by thread: calc question ,
- Next by thread: Re: calc question ,
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|