Re: A support line and separation problem
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:56:23 -0500
On 24 Mar 2006 18:17:55 -0800, "MK" <martagawel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey everyone.
I have 2 questions:
1.) Find an example of a closed, non-convex set in R2 such that every
boundary point has a support line.
It's sort of a trick question
Hint #1: No one said the non-convex set had to be connected.
Hint #2: Start small.
I've been playing with several shapes in 2-D that aren't convex
but just can't get it because the support lines cut through my shape in
the concave section of my shapes. Any ideas?
2.) Prove that the triangle inequality doesn't hold for sets. ie) find
sets A,B,C in R2 (2-D) so that
d(A,B) + d(B,C) < d(A,C)
Hint: Take 3 disks in R^2, and fool with the positions.
I think I'm having problems with this because I don't understand what
kind of sets I'm looking for. Plus, I have the actual triangle
inequality stuck in my head when I start drawing things out.
If you draw your sets as single points, of course the triangle
inequality will appear to hold.
So how can I do this with shapes?
Give your sets some territory.
And as suggested above, try simple shapes first.
As a general guideline, when you need to find counterexamples, start
with the simplest potential candidates, proceeding to more complicated
constructions only if forced.
quasi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A support line and separation problem
- From: quasi
- Re: A support line and separation problem
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Open geometry problem?
- Next by Date: Re: Palindromic movie
- Previous by thread: A support line and separation problem
- Next by thread: Re: A support line and separation problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|