Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: "Robert Low" <mtx014@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Mar 2006 03:02:26 -0800
Han de Bruijn wrote:
Robert Low wrote:
Han de Bruijn wrote:But e = 1/n and that depends on n .
Infinitesimals are just very smal real numbers. What's your problem?Just the minor one that it doesn't work. So, let e be
an infinitesimal. (i.e. a very small real number).
No, e is an infinitesimal. That's just a very small number,
remember?
Then n.e = 1 . Can't help if you
don't know how to handle limits in the way they should. Really can't
help ...
I think we can both agree that you can't help me with limits.
Sure. And all limits commute with each other. Especially ifLalala. There is no need for "commuting limits". I don't understand
you put your fingers in your ears and sing 'lalala' whenever
somebody tries to explain to you otherwise.
where the idea comes from.
Ispe dixisti.
I'm working in a finite domain. And only
in the very last phase, when all "commuting" is over(?), let n->oo .
I thought that was my point. You're letting n tend to infinity
*after* you use your purported infinitesimal: but the infinitesimal
isn't defined until after you take the limit.
There is a perfectly well-definedI know. And that _is_ a probability. Not only "sort of".
sense in which one talks about things like 'the probability
of choosing a multiple of 3', and it's asymptotic density.
Not by any notion of being a probability that the rest of us share.
Why not just use a tool that works instead of tying togetherWhy not being _terse_. And not define yet another framework (asymptotic
two lengths of baling wire and a rusty fork, and insisting
that the result is a screwdriver?
densities) if you already have one (probability theory) that should fit
the bill, just fine.
Hey, *you* are the one trying to define a new framework (infinitesimal
probabilities). The rest of us are quite happy to observe that standard
probability doesn't work here, and use a viable alternative.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- References:
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: mzafrullah
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Robert Low
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Robert Low
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Robert Low
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Robert Low
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Robert Low
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- Prev by Date: Re: A Bijection N --> NxN
- Next by Date: Re: generate Gaussian Triples-
- Previous by thread: Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- Next by thread: Re: Probability in an infinite sample space
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|