Re: Base R^infinity ??
- From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:28:03 -0500
In <e0i6ss$2iba$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 03/31/2006
at 03:15 AM, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin) said:
Yes, that's what I understand too.
I assumed that he meant L^2. Again, though, you would need the AOC to
prove the existence of a Hamel basis.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Base R^infinity ??
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Base R^infinity ??
- References:
- Base R^infinity ??
- From: gabriel_skupien
- Re: Base R^infinity ??
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Re: Base R^infinity ??
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Base R^infinity ??
- From: Peter Webb
- Re: Base R^infinity ??
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Base R^infinity ??
- Prev by Date: Re: Homeomorphic but not isomorphic.
- Next by Date: Re: Base R^infinity ??
- Previous by thread: Re: Base R^infinity ??
- Next by thread: Re: Base R^infinity ??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|