Re: math development curiosity question
- From: "david petry" <david_lawrence_petry@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Mar 2006 13:45:53 -0800
quat wrote:
Is it possible that different cultures took fundamentally different
approaches to math and worked with different systems?
Like roman numerals vs. Arabic numerals?
Something that has come up often in this newsgroup is whether Cantor's
set theory was inevitable. The argument is that if Kronecker (and maybe
Brouwer) had presented just slightly better arguments, Cantor's ideas
would have never taken root.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: math development curiosity question
- Prev by Date: Re: Why negative numbers don't exist
- Next by Date: Re: Logarithm of transfinite numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Why negative numbers don't exist
- Next by thread: Re: math development curiosity question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|