Re: math development curiosity question
- From: "david petry" <david_lawrence_petry@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Apr 2006 16:13:01 -0700
Robert Low wrote:
david petry wrote:
Robert Low wrote:
david petry wrote:Except that it's distinctly different from interval analysis.
So what I propose is the we (mathematicians) first develop a theory ofAnd we could give it a cool name, like, say, interval analysis.
finite precision real numbers, which can be represented as rationals
plus a measure of uncertainty. Then a theory of differential equations
can be developed using those finite precision reals,
It is? So it exists already? Don't keep it to yourself, share
it with us.
The notion of uncertainty is a probabilistic notion.
Or if it doesn't, develop it and prove what you say. Everybody
else seems to think that mathematics is trundling along quite
acceptably, so it would be nice to see this better way in action.
This was something I was interested in when I was in graduate school
quite a few years ago. I believed that I could develop a foundation
for mathematics which would make the transfer of our mathematical
knowledge to a computer (i.e. an artificial intelligence) especially
easy. I encountered a tad bit of condescension and hostility to my
ideas, so I quit.
And by the way, not *everybody* else thinks everything is just fine in
the foundations of mathematics.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Robert Low
- Re: math development curiosity question
- References:
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: david petry
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: david petry
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Robert Low
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: david petry
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Robert Low
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: david petry
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Robert Low
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: david petry
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Robert Low
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: david petry
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Robert Low
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: david petry
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Robert Low
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: david petry
- Re: math development curiosity question
- From: Robert Low
- Re: math development curiosity question
- Prev by Date: Re: A globally convergent series for the zeta function
- Next by Date: Re: A globally convergent series for the zeta function
- Previous by thread: Re: math development curiosity question
- Next by thread: Re: math development curiosity question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|