Re: JSH: Prime counting should be easier


Salyman wrote:
"Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:87k69x882e.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[...]

Mathematical arguments are either valid or not. They don't depend on
employment histories.

With Mathematical Proofs that is so, but "arguments" are open ended, and
experience histories count,
That is why he needs to post his resume in this news group to end all
arguments on weather he is just a troll or just fishing around, or he has
the intellegence to really discover something.

His posts themselves are enough to determine that he doesn't have
anything new.

Actually, I looked at his prime-counting function, and it is correct.
However, it is not new, and it is not an improvement on the existing
algorithm. (Actually, he had made it more inefficient.) If JSH had the
mathematical background, he would have been able to determine this on
his own. If JSH had the mathematical maturity, he wouldn't be harping
about this, many years on.

--- Christopher Heckman

.