Re: Calculus XOR Probability

David C. Ullrich wrote to Jesse F. Hughes:

That one detail in one of you arguments is pretty weak. Doesn't
matter much, given the abundance of utterly simple and perfectly
valid other arguments.

Cuddle, cuddle ...

Han de Bruijn

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: An uncountable countable set
    ... Han de Bruijn wrote: ... and all the irrationals are not numbers. ... (I've tried "On the abundance of the irrational numbers") ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: An uncountable countable set
    ... Han de Bruijn wrote: ... that sqrt, pi, e and all the irrationals are not numbers. ... (I've tried "On the abundance of the irrational numbers") ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Why exp(-st) in the Laplace Transform?
    ... On 11/25/2004 12:17 PM, Han de Bruijn wrote: ... Thank you Han, ... The first reason for me to submit to ... viel schneidiger unternommen, doch gänzlich mißlang und jetzt zumal, wo ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Why exp(-st) in the Laplace Transform?
    ... On 11/25/2004 12:17 PM, Han de Bruijn wrote: ... Thank you Han, ... The first reason for me to submit to ... viel schneidiger unternommen, doch gänzlich mißlang und jetzt zumal, wo ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism
    ... > Han de Bruijn wrote: ... > have no idea about what really can be done in finite (puzzle) time. ... > The "combinatorial explosion" is a red herring. ...
    (sci.math)