Re: Calculus XOR Probability

*** T. Winter said:
In article <1144959368.304033.270220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
...
> Whoa, Tony, not so fast!

What I am wondering is the way you side on occasion with Tony. Your
argument appears to be that infinite sets are actually finite but
extremely large. I do not think that is what Tony is stating.


No, I talk more about completed actual infinities, and Han speaks more about
unboundedly large but more or less finite sets with constant relationships, but
there's not a lot of difference there, really. Brian likes to say I am talking
about the "imponderably large but finite", because I am dealing with these
infinite values similarly to finite values. So, what Han and I agree on is that
considering infinities is a lot like considering the infinite case for finite
sets, and that the standard system can be improved to handle this. Is that
right Han? After all, this was Han's thread, where he was making a point, and I
was supporting his concept. He's not necessarily siding with me. :)
--
Smiles,

Tony
.

Loading