Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Virgil <vmhjr2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:41:10 -0600
In article <MPG.1eada3c3e702e28c98ac36@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually, I DID define all finite reals in terms of a few non-circular rules:
1) 0<x<=1 -> finite(x)
2) finite(x) -> finite(0-x)
3) finite(x) -> finite(1/x)
4) finite(x) -> finite(2^x) (optional)
That definition is circular as a definition of reals, since you need
reals to construct it. Where does TO get his reals from originally?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Matt Gutting
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- References:
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: cbrown
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: imaginatorium
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Prev by Date: Re: How to calculate a geometric ratio from a known sum of geometric progression to 23 terms 4408 and a fist number 901?
- Next by Date: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Previous by thread: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Next by thread: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Index(es):