Re: Calculus XOR Probability

In article <MPG.1eb065246a4a815298ac46@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

imaginatorium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx said:

Right. Which 'NUMBER' in particular? I suggest the one at which the
count stops (because it has reached the end of the finite set). In the
familiar method of counting by reciting a ditty, this answer is thus
the last number shouted out.

Right, so generally if there is no well defined end, there is no well defined
size.

That's the advantage do the von Neumann system. The number for the set
being counted is always the smallest (first) ordinal NOT used, which
always exists as the set of all previous ordinals.

Do you think the elements of
the Klein 4-group are "numbers"?

I am not familiar with the Klein 4-group, but if truth itself is decomposable
into numbers, then what isn't?

Who says truth is decomposable into numbers?


Of course, something like the size of a set is
generally considered to mean the number of elements in the set, so Klein or
not, set sizes are numbers.

It is whether the members of the group, not the size of the group, are
numbers that is at issue. Stick to the issue, TO.
.

Quantcast