Simplify boolean expressions
- From: "eksamor" <eksamor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Apr 2006 04:41:23 -0700
These two boolean expressions are equivalent:
1) not(a) AND not(b) AND c
2) not(b) AND c
but why??
I have tried making a karnaugh map to it does not minimze 1) to 2)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simplify boolean expressions
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Simplify boolean expressions
- Prev by Date: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Next by Date: Re: induction problem for proving that (n+k)!/n! is divisible by k!
- Previous by thread: Should be easy
- Next by thread: Re: Simplify boolean expressions
- Index(es):