Re: JSH: Extreme mathematics reminder
- From: Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.asupprimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:23:53 +0200
Proginoskes a écrit :
fishfry wrote:In article <1145776171.229104.172840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Larry Lard wrote:Isn't that how a scientific theory always wins? I believe that's one ofJustin wrote:--- this poster included ---Richard Henry <rphenry@xxxxxxxx> wrote:It's not hard to think of people who used to be regular JSH-groupies,
: I must have missed that - whom have you crushed? Please name three.
Heck, name ONE!
and no longer are. Nora Baron; Andrezj Unpronounable (sp) (possibly the
same person); Arturo Magidin no longer replies directly to James, I
believe; David Ullrich seems to have given up providing mathematical
objections, and is now just poking the anthill with a stick like so
many of the rest of us;
there was a chap called... David Libert? whoWell, he may believe that if they don't object to his theories any
was _very_ good at keeping track of the last n counterexamples and
postpending links to them to all the posts he made in JSH threads; and
of course crank.net head honcho Erik Max Francis. There are, I'm sure,
many more.
It wouldn't take a huge leap for James to believe he 'forced' these
people to stop posting by 'crushing' them.
more, then he's won.
JSH's observations that contains more than a grain of truth.
Yes, but you need a horde of people who believe the new theory. JSH by
himself is not a horde.
His name was Legion ?
.
--- Christopher Heckman
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: Extreme mathematics reminder
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: JSH: Extreme mathematics reminder
- Prev by Date: H theorems
- Next by Date: quadratic residues confusion
- Previous by thread: H theorems
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Extreme mathematics reminder
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|