Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:44:35 -0500
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:24:03 -0700, William Elliot
<marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
No, (f_n)_n is uniformly convergent on {1}
Thus you add to your intervals the set {1}, and you've shown
quasi-uniformity. For not quasi-uniformity you may have to adjust
your definition as I hinted above. As this is getting all much
complex with quotings, comments and corrections, may I suggest you present
a rewritten and revised copy instead of further patchings and correctings?
That make additional discussion much easier for both of us.
Why not just admit you have no idea how to answer the question,
instead of quibbling and pretending not to understand?
Here's the definition: Suppose that f_n : [0,1] -> R for
n = 1, 2, ... . Suppose that f : [0,1] -> R. We say that
f_n -> f quasi-uniformly if [0,1] is a countable union
[0,1] = union A_j, such that for every j, the restriction
of f_n to A_j tends uniformly to the restriction of f to A_j
as n -> infinity.
Here's the problem: Find an example of pointwise convergence
which is not quasi-uniform.
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- From: William Elliot
- Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- References:
- Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- From: William Elliot
- Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- From: eugene
- Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- From: William Elliot
- Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- Prev by Date: Re: Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle
- Next by Date: Re: quadratic residues confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- Next by thread: Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- Index(es):