Re: quadratic residues confusion
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:52:35 -0500
On 23 Apr 2006 01:40:14 -0700, "perltcl@xxxxxxxxx" <perltcl@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
hi
I read in this group, quadratic residues are fully multiplicative,
That doesn't make much sense - you mean that you read that Legendre
symbols are completely nultiplicative.
see
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.math.maple/browse_thread/thread/5a47330e108d158b/13bfa08d3f0a2130?lnk=st&q=Legendre+symbol++are+multiplicative&rnum=4&hl=en#13bfa08d3f0a2130
but since Legendre symbols have values {1,-1}
does that mean if I have (-1)*(-1)=1 ==>> two non-residues multipled
together to get a residue?
strange
Why is it strange for the product of two non-squares to be a square?
Think about the integers. Is 2 a square? How about 2 times 2?
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: quadratic residues confusion
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: quadratic residues confusion
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: quadratic residues confusion
- References:
- quadratic residues confusion
- From: perltcl@xxxxxxxxx
- quadratic residues confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: pointwise but not quasi-uniform
- Next by Date: Re: Why not Tanh(3x) for Hyperbolic Cubic Equations
- Previous by thread: Re: quadratic residues confusion
- Next by thread: Re: quadratic residues confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|