Re: isprime of flattened primes...
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:27:00 -0400
On 21 Apr 2006 23:04:23 GMT, rusin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Rusin)
wrote:
In article <eeudnXzMyp2wotTZRVn-iA@xxxxxxxxx>,
Gerard Schildberger <Gerard46@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Consider the number series
where each number is a flattened list of primes (that
is, a list of primes with the blanks removed to form
a single number).
Once you get "past" the single digit primes, should
there be any more primes?
What does "should" mean here? Anyway, Maple reports that
235711131719232931374143475359616771737983899710110310710911312713113713914\
91511571631671731791811911931971992112232272292332392412512572632692712\
77281283293307311313317331337347349353359367373379383389397401409419421\
43143343944344945746146346747948749149950350952152354154755756356957157\
7587593599601607613617619631641643647653659661673677683691701709719
is prime.
However in fairness to the OP, let me point out that the
counterexamples all appear to be rather "small".
Let a_n be the concatenation of the first n primes.
Thus, a = 2, 23, 235, 2357, 235711, 23571113, ...
Conjecture 1: a_n is composite for all sufficiently large n.
Conjecture 2: a_n is composite for all n > 435
quasi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: isprime of flattened primes...
- From: quasi
- Re: isprime of flattened primes...
- References:
- isprime of flattened primes...
- From: Gerard Schildberger
- Re: isprime of flattened primes...
- From: Dave Rusin
- isprime of flattened primes...
- Prev by Date: Re: quadratic residues confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Indian Film on Ramanujan being made.
- Previous by thread: Re: isprime of flattened primes...
- Next by thread: Re: isprime of flattened primes...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|