Re: A physics question about infinity
- From: David W. Cantrell <DWCantrell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Apr 2006 16:37:25 GMT
richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin) wrote:
In article <20060425121535.984$yH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
David W. Cantrell <DWCantrell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You're entitled to your opinion, of course. But I see virtually no
difference between the care which one must use when dealing with zero
and that which one must use when dealing with an infinity in an extended
number system. For example, corresponding to the example you gave:
For example, if y might be zero, you can't deduce x=1 from x*y=y.
Well, with zero, of the four simple arithmetic operations you only
have to worry about cancelling in multiplication;
In an extended system, with zero, I'd be loath to say that we don't have
to worry about cancelling in division. For example, if y might be zero,
you can't deduce x=1 from x/y=1/y.
with infinity you have to worry about all four.
Yes, what you have to be careful about with zero regarding
multiplication/division, you have to be careful about with infinity
regarding both multiplication/division and addition/subtraction. But
it seems like essentially the same sort of care in all those cases.
And we mathematicians are a careful sort anyway.
David
.
- References:
- A physics question about infinity
- From: Golden Boar
- Re: A physics question about infinity
- From: Norm Dresner
- Re: A physics question about infinity
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: A physics question about infinity
- From: David W . Cantrell
- Re: A physics question about infinity
- From: Richard Tobin
- A physics question about infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Next by Date: Re: A physics question about infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: A physics question about infinity
- Next by thread: Re: A physics question about infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|