Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- From: digikey@xxxxxxxxx (D. Akers)
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:37:03 -0400
Alexander wrote:
<snip>"Since the bets would be placed on each of the block bets, thus
covering every number other then the 0 or double 0, you would require a
long sequence of results landing on 0 or double 0 to prevent a profit."
<snip>
_____________________________________
Re:
I didn't comprehend this in my first read of your post. If you cover
every number but 0 and 00 by betting all three blocks of 12, then the
probability of losing all three wagers (0 or 00) on any given spin is
5.26% on a double-0 wheel. Unless I'm missing something in your system,
any other result (1 through 36) is a wash since any win comes with two
loses. I would suggest you run your system on just one block of 12.
Dan Akers
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- References:
- Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- From: Alexander Donis
- Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- Prev by Date: Re: A physics question about infinity
- Next by Date: gradient field/geodesics
- Previous by thread: Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- Next by thread: Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|