Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel



Alexander wrote:
<snip>"Most people though seem to think that the casino always wins
because of the 0 or double 0. However these are irrelevant to the
sequence since they merely represent a losing bet and you move further
along the sequence.
Since the bets would be placed on each of the block bets, thus covering
every number other then the 0 or double 0, you would require a long
sequence of results landing on 0 or double 0 to prevent a profit. Or
alternatively for one of the block bets to run for a very long time
before finishing.
As stated in my original question, other than a long losing sequence on
one of the block bets, are there any other reasons why this would not
work."
______________________________________
Re:
If you run your system on just one block of 12, then the probabilistic
breakdown of the winning spin breaks down like this for a double-0
wheel:
31.6% chance of winning on spin #1 (F=1), 21.6% on spin #2 (F=1), 14.8%
on spin #3 (F=2), 10.1% on spin #4 (F=3), 6.9% on spin #5 (F=5), 4.7% on
spin #6 (F=8), 3.2% on spin #7 (F=13), 2.2% on spin #8 (F=21), and 1.5%
on spin #9 (F=34). Thus, there is a 96.6% probability of winning before
spin #10. This leaves a 3.4% probability of having to bank-roll more
than 9 spins. So, if you can bank-roll 9 spins of the wheel in your
system, then about 96.6% of the time you will walk away from the table
with a relatively small profit. However, it is the other 3.4% of the
time, when you take a loss, a huge loss relative to the unit value, that
previous profits will be wiped out. Example: walking away from the
table after a loss on spin #9 results in a loss of 88 units. That is
the primary reason your system, as stated, will not "work" in the long
run. In fact, it is the "long run" that makes the 0 and 00, along with
the implicit 5.2% house advantage, very relavent and less than a
zero-sum game for your system.

Dan Akers

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Craps probability question: Clarification of "Expert"
    ... >50% chance to complete his bets without that loss. ... Martingale sequence, ... the probability of getting four heads is ...
    (rec.gambling.craps)
  • Thoughts on Europeans Spoiler? (Long)
    ... hilarious...he's skating to Vivaldi's Four Seasons not "the zebra's ... twizzles and falls out of them often but since his step sequence is so ... skater has worked on a very complicated combination spin (most of them ... much stopped dead on every jump except the lutz combo. ...
    (rec.sport.skating.ice.figure)
  • Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
    ... Name one beyond the 1000 fsaar that has actually been ... I've never dismissed any example of a large protein produce by any ... based on a non-specific block or loss of a previous interaction. ... does not involve the production of a specific sequence. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Hershey: Im right because Im right
    ... Modification of sequence is ... not a *loss* of function. ... or different function (antibiotic resistance) by a process that is ... the minimum *possible* gap size ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Hershey: Im right because Im right
    ... functional sequence to a different functional sequence is NOT random ... not a *loss* of function. ... with a pile of amino acids and starts assembling them ... or different function (antibiotic resistance) by a process that is ...
    (talk.origins)

Loading