Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- From: "jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Apr 2006 17:13:39 -0700
D. Akers wrote:
Alexander wrote:
<snip>"Since the bets would be placed on each of the block bets, thus
covering every number other then the 0 or double 0, you would require a
long sequence of results landing on 0 or double 0 to prevent a profit."
<snip>
_____________________________________
Re:
I didn't comprehend this in my first read of your post. If you cover
every number but 0 and 00 by betting all three blocks of 12, then the
probability of losing all three wagers (0 or 00) on any given spin is
5.26% on a double-0 wheel. Unless I'm missing something in your system,
any other result (1 through 36) is a wash since any win comes with two
loses. I would suggest you run your system on just one block of 12.
It's not quite a wash, since the amount bet on a particular spin in
each of the three blocks would depend on the history of that block.
Ignoring the 0 - 00 trap, on every spin, one of the bets would be the
start of the Fib series, since in that block, there was a win on the
previous spin...
But of course, there is *no* way to combine losing bets of various
sizes to create a winning situation in the long run...
.
- References:
- Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- From: Alexander Donis
- Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- From: D. Akers
- Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- Prev by Date: Re: Real orthogonal group probability question
- Next by Date: Re: Student Solutions Manual
- Previous by thread: Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- Next by thread: Re: Fibonacci and the roullette wheel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|