Re: Question

In article <1146420387.565174.229030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"zuhair" <zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Divide that number by itself will only result in itself, since it is
infinite?!

Zuhair

Any number that it is possible to divide by, divided by itself had
better be equal to 1, or all of mathematics will collapse.

Zuhair claims to have "numbers" x such that x/x = x.

Not even TO is that far in the bag.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Question
    ... Any number that it is possible to divide by, ... Not even TO is that far in the bag. ... Oh, Virgil, that's the nicest thing you've ever said to me! ... half life?), but I can prove the infinite is finite, and zero's not zero, and ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor Confusion
    ... How do you divide? ... >> Suppose I have an edge that is divided in countably many shares. ... > We need not divide anything by infinite numbers, ... That is similar to asking me to prove the parallel axiom without the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor Confusion
    ... > An edge is considered to be a set of shares. ... If you divide n edges into m equal shares each, ... We need not divide anything by infinite numbers, ... Every level of the tree has a finite number n. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Primitive Pythagorean triangles: An infinite number of them or not?
    ... is there an infinite number of solutions ... It is trivial that this yields a Pythagorean Triple (in fact, ... and s are relatively prime and of opposite parity). ... b, then p must divides either 2, or must divide r, or must ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor Confusion
    ... Dik T. Winter wrote: ... >>> What is wrong with WM's mapping? ... Then you divide the passed half again ... infinite case you do not because *all* parts you pass to a path are ...
    (sci.math)