Re: Old Cantor was right
- From: "zuhair" <zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 May 2006 10:29:50 -0700
Student of Math wrote:
Hi,fellow_mathematicians,
I have some problems about Cantor set(since April 2005),
I think there is a contradistion in it.
I think uncountablity is just coming with continumm only.
If any on is agree with me.
I showed that:[0,1/3^n] ~c ; when n is infinity.( c is the cardinal of
real num set).
I think Cantors hypothesis is ALL RIGHT,even Cohen proved some thing
perhaps different in 1964.
What did Cohen prove?
Rgd.
Zuhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Old Cantor was right
- From: Student of Math
- Re: Old Cantor was right
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Old Cantor was right
- References:
- Old Cantor was right
- From: Student of Math
- Old Cantor was right
- Prev by Date: Representing Omega
- Next by Date: " f^ [n](x) = exp( n/ phi' (x) D ) o x "
- Previous by thread: Re: Old Cantor was right
- Next by thread: Re: Old Cantor was right
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
