Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Virgil <vmhjr2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 17:46:40 -0600
In article <MPG.1ec14bf59cdb4d3a98aca3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And, if you think the direction of the approximating elements doesn't
matter in measuring the curve, then you're simply wrong, and need to
look back at the basics of how calculus works.
The measure of the length of a curve is standardly defined to be the
least upper bound, if there is one, of the polygonal lengths, with
polygons or broken lines having a finite number of segments.
In the case of an actual staircase curve, the longest polygonal
approximation is the staircase itself.
But for the limit function all polygons lie strictly along the diagonal.
Thus the lengths of the staircases are strictly greater that the length
of the limit diagonal as the step size goes to zero.
.
- References:
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: cbrown
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: stephen
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Prev by Date: Re: Z/2Z
- Next by Date: Re: Trigonometry eguation
- Previous by thread: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Next by thread: Re: Calculus XOR Probability
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|