Re: Calculus XOR Probability

cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:
cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
Tony Orlow wrote:

<snipped lots of good stuff>

Another fine post. Your patience in trying to explain
things to Tony is remarkable.


Then you're being clueless. You should be able to parse that statement. Or, did
you read "probabilities" as "possibilities" again? Remedial English is down the
hall to the left.

This is Remedial Mathematics. The current topic is "what is a valid
mathematical argument?". Stay in your seat until the bell rings.

If that's your attitude, the discussion's over. Have a nice day.


Ah well. Sorry you feel that way. See ya round then!

I'm not going to tolerate that kind of condescending nonsense.

But I should tolerate being told to that I am "clueless", and that I
should "go to Remedial English"? You don't consider that a
condescending or otherwise insulting remark, which is not to the point
of the argument?

It seems to me if you are going to dish out "jovial" insults of this
sort, you should be willing to accept them as well.

This seems to be indicative of the general lack of consistency
in Tony's thought process. He is apparently free to make
insulting remarks about remedial education, but if anyone
else does it is "condescending nonsense" which he will not
tolerate. Is it any wonder he cannot put together a
consistent mathematical argument?

Stephen
.