JSH: Crowd mentality, consensus, and fraud

If you look at a few things that I've done, it's impossible not to
wonder what's going on here that people are getting away with calling
me a crackpot, and acting as if I've accomplished nothing.

For instance, I have an open source project. It's a tool for Java
programmers that lets them look up class information. I think it's a
useful thing for coding.

You can see how it ranks worldwide in its category:

http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Programming/Languages/Java/Development_Tools/Code_Exploring_and_Managing/

I have a B.Sc. in physics from Vanderbilt University, but you can read
people deriding a physics degree in reply to me.

I have an article I wrote for the Wikipedia, giving it the first prime
counting function article, now available in the history:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prime_counting_function&oldid=9142249

The prime counting function there while similar in important ways to
what was known before me, is also different in crucial ways, and come
on, it's one of the smallest bits of mathematics for counting prime
numbers ever seen.

Just go look at anything on prime counting and look at what else is out
there.

And I got a paper published in a peer reviewed mathematical journal
which had been around for over nine years before I came along and some
sci.math'ers came along, and showed just how weak the current journal
system in mathematics is.

Rationalizations.

Faced with a volume of accomplishments like few others and real
mathematical results like nothing ever before seen in the world, people
call me names.

And they get away with it.

Why?

Because the current math field has been taken over by people who
figured out a long time ago that they can just SAY things, without
worrying about actually proving them, as the concept of mathematical
proof is an ideal, which people can fail to achieve, yet claim they
have done so.

I've been in arguments for years about the distributrive property,
where I point out that, you know, well, if you multiply something, it
gets multiplied whatever it's value--even if it's a function.

The arguments are absurd in a real way, but they go on because math
society is a society of style over substance, where people who cannot
achieve real mathematical proof, found out they could claim it, and get
rewards.

The cons took over the system.

Some of you need to look up Britney Gallivan. She came up with a nifty
mathematical argument that covers paper folding. She got some news
articles, mentioned on television, but what has the math community
done?

She's been snubbed.

Your world is controlled by people who cannot who are afraid of the
people like me who can--or Britney Gallivan.

And they are stupid, or they'd throw a bone here and there, so that I
wouldn't be able to step out here and point out the obvious.

So why do people let them lie?

Why did people let Bush lie?

And that's about life and blood.

This is just mathematics.

You people live in your lie as long as you think you can, and when it
is revealed and the consequences come down, there will be no mercy
because people will read post after post, where people here from the
math community, showed their true colors.

Remember with Enron? Remember the taped phone calls?

Well, your posts here are the equivalent.

Your public statements are not only freely available for use by
reporters around the world, but they are also admissable in courts of
law around the world.

My role here has been, investigator for the prosecution.

My role was to use whatever means were necessary that were ethical and
within the bounds of the law to fully reveal the full extent of the
corruption within the math field.

The most important thing in any prosecution is an air-tight case.

I needed as much on the record as possible, as the best witnesses are
mathematicians themselves.

You are my voice. Your posts here are my work product.


James Harris

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: why lorentz transformation?
    ... If he didn't think that it was mathematics, ... Deal with the math or shut the fuck up. ... >| new coordinates xi, eta, zeta, tau, and no symbol is used to denote ... notation became important for you later in your posting. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • =?UTF-8?B?2YHYsdmI2LQg2YXYrNmF2YjYudmHINqp2KfZhdmEINqp2KrYp9io2YfYp9uMINix24zYpw==?= =?UTF-8
    ... Probability Theory The Logic of Science, ... Copyright © 1989 by Addison-Wesley Publishing ... Elliptic Curves Number Theory and Cryptography Discrete Mathematics ...
    (sci.math.num-analysis)
  • Re: Cantors Theory: Mathematical creationism
    ... Science is just another religion in that sense in that it's just another ... It came from mathematics. ... a big part of the foundation of math. ... what is said with language? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Hard science of evolution
    ... they look at the math carefully and notice the unrealistic ... running through inertia-less pulleys that you encounter in Physics 101. ... And show that fitness really is heritable. ... always wanted to know if there was mathematics that can be used to ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Survival langauge
    ... >>>the math involved. ... Literally everything is mathematics. ... >Universe, using mathematics. ... I don't agree that scientists have discovered any such thing. ...
    (alt.usage.english)