Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 18:12:02 GMT
G.E. Ivey wrote:
It's hard for me to believe this has gone on so long. While every "quibble" is correct (and mathematicians love quibbles!) John Smith did say "mathematically equivalent", not "identical" or "the same" or "equal" so I would have no trouble at all accepting "Yes, they are mathematically equivalent".
That's a great answer. But I don't think it could be fully appreciated without the long discussion that preceded it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- References:
- naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: John Smith
- Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: G.E. Ivey
- naive question from a non-mathematician
- Prev by Date: Re: Books Advice (Algebraic Topology and Differential Geometry)
- Next by Date: Re: Compound Interest
- Previous by thread: Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- Next by thread: Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- Index(es):