Re: A New Definition of Prime Number

"ai" is commonly proncounced, like "eye," in German e.g.;
aye?

thus:
whose cevians trisect the perimeter, by symmetry. seems as if
you can handwave a proof, from there, that
scalene trigona have only one such center....

wait; it's also pretty clear that an equiangular trigon has
only *one* such center, the incenter (it has other names .-)
so, maybe the scalene has three of them, if not none?

thus:
it's easy to prove that Fermat could have had a fundamental insight
into the theory of numbers, from the record of all of his challenges
with no mistakes, essentially, but that you-all habitually refer
to this as "his last theorem" (although that simply means,
the last one for us-all to have solved).

and I hope that I'll be forgiven for, again, traipsing blithely
into that from which there is no intellectual escape,
JSHism, pro- or contra-.

and no picture, from the encyc.:
X(402) = GOSSARD PERSPECTOR

--It takes at least two to polka!
http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/anmlies.html
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/2006_articles/Keplerian.W05.pdf
http://larouchepub.com/other/2006/3315greenland_ice.html
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac
http://wlym.com/pdf/iclc/walterlippman.pdf
http://www.benfranklinbooks.com/
http://tarpley.net/bush12.htm
http://www.wlym.com/pdf/iclc/howthenation.pdf
http://larouchepub.com/other/2003/3048iraq_58_const.html
http://www.rand.org/publications/randreview/issues/rr.12.00/
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01.html

.