Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: "Gene Ward Smith" <genewardsmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 May 2006 11:42:03 -0700
cody.roux@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Yes. It is usually implicitly assumed when you are talking about the
field of complex numbers, that you have the inclusions N in Z in Q in R
in C. It probably would be more correct (and horribly unpractical) to
talk about injective mappings in each case.
I don't see why; all the above are instrinsically defined in terms of C.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- References:
- naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: John Smith
- Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: N. Silver
- Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: quat
- Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- From: cody . roux
- naive question from a non-mathematician
- Prev by Date: Re: Infinite Knots
- Next by Date: Re: Infinite Knots
- Previous by thread: Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- Next by thread: Re: naive question from a non-mathematician
- Index(es):