Re: Number theory assertion



On 27 May 2006 13:12:39 -0700, "Deep" <deepkdeb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Kindly consider the following two equations under the given conditions.

A^1/2 + B^1/2 = u^k (1)

A^1/2 - B^1/2 = v^k (2)
Given conditions: A, B are integers each > 1 , none is a perfect square
and (A,B)=1.
Odd k > 3 and (uv) is an integer > 1.

Assertion: u, v must assume values of the forms (3) and (4) where E >
F>1 and none is a perfect square.

u = E^1/2 + F^1/2 (3)

v = E^1/2 - F^1/2 (4)

Any comment upon the correctness of the assertion will be appreciated.

Question: I can see why you exclude k=1 but why do you exclude k=3?

quasi
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: --- --- Irrational solutions
    ... R is positive rational but not a perfect square. ...    R is a positive rational but not a perfect square. ... specifications for the missing declarations, your assertion is false, ... linear algebra -- brief review of vector spaces, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: --- --- Irrational solutions
    ... R is positive rational but not a perfect square. ... You need to declare the restrictions on _all_ your variables. ... specifications for the missing declarations, your assertion is false, ... your almost certainly false assertion, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Number theory assertion
    ... In article, Deep ... A, B are integers each> 1, none is a perfect square ... Any comment upon the correctness of the assertion will be appreciated. ... Anyway, F>1 still fails.) ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: --- --- Solutions of Equations
    ... but none is a perfect square ... Any helpful comment about the correctness of the assertion will be ... so A is a perfect square. ... Deep is not requiring a,b to be rational. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: the probability theory has holes!
    ... we exlude the first 1/2 ... for 3:then we exclude 1/3 but half of them have factor 2 so we ... to re-think your assertion. ... Cheerfully resisting change since 1959. ...
    (sci.math)

Quantcast