Re: People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle
- From: David W. Cantrell <DWCantrell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2006 11:19:20 GMT
lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph) wrote:
David W. Cantrell <DWCantrell@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
"Brablo" <gestureofrespect@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it's my opinion that people find the golden rectangle (one whose
ratios are 1:1.616...) as very appealing.
It's your opinion and it's certainly a well known "factoid". But it's
probably not true.
"Probably"?
Sorry! You're absolutely right. I should have simply said that it's not
true, period.
Demonstrably (as far as such things can be demonstrated):
Mathematical proofs are surer. I plead that my "probably" was due to the
relative uncertainty of experiments compared to mathematical proof.
Cheers,
David
experiments have been run in which people are presented with rectangles.
of various aspects, and asked to rate their "appeal"; the "golden
rectangle" doesn't win, even allowing for lots of slop.
It's numerology, rather than mathematics or aesthetics.
do you think that humans have acquired the taste to enjoy viewing the
GR or do you think that there is a math reasoning behind this (i.e.
our viewing angle is around 1:1.62?)?
Neither.
Alas, humans demonstrably *have* "acquired the taste to enjoy"
bullshitting.
Lee Rudolph
- References:
- People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle
- From: Brablo
- Re: People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle
- From: David W . Cantrell
- Re: People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle
- From: Lee Rudolph
- People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle
- Prev by Date: Re: Balanced set of topological vector space
- Next by Date: Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math
- Previous by thread: Re: People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle
- Next by thread: Re: People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle
- Index(es):