Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution
- From: israel@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Israel)
- Date: 5 Jun 2006 10:23:09 GMT
In article <1149490925.527163.180660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<yaoziyuan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On June 4, every Chinese media reported that "two Chinese
mathematicians finally solved Poincare's conjecture." (
http://english.people.com.cn/200606/04/eng20060604_270860.html )
Shing-Tung Yau and another Chinese mathematician Yang Le are the
principal endorsors of the two mathematicians Zhu and Cao's claim. In
Chinese versions of the news, Yang Le even boasted that "The American
Hamilton contributed over 50%, the Russian Perelman about 25%, and the
Chinese Yau, Zhu and Cao et al about 30%." (
http://www.popyard.com/cgi-mod/npost.cgi?num=90542&r=0 )
First accounts of mathematics-related events in Western news media are
often inaccurate. I don't know if the Chinese media are better at this.
But it seems there is such a paper in Vol. 10 #2 of the Asian Journal of
Mathematics, and its abstract can be found at
<http://www.intlpress.com/AJM/p/2006/10_2/AJM-10-2-165-498-Abstract.php>
Yes, it does claim to provide a complete proof of the Poincaré and the
geometrization conjectures. I didn't find a preprint in arXiv.org, or
on Cao's website.
Yau also pointed out that "Cao and Zhu's work has much more value than
proving Goldbach's conjecture." (
http://www.popyard.com/cgi-mod/npost.cgi?num=90584&r=0 ) I think his
mention to Goldbach's conjecture is because a Chinese mathematician
Chen Jinrun made real contribution to it in the 60's and was since well
known by every ordinary Chinese.
I think the Chinese audiences' minds are heavily hijacked by Yau's
irresponsible words. Can some independent Western mathematicians stand
out and talk back?
If Cao and Zhu's claim is correct, and I have no particular reason to
doubt it, I would not be at all surprised if this paper was very
valuable indeed. And Yau would be in a good position to comment
on this. But in some sense Yau's statement is rather strange:
these are completely different areas of mathematics, and since we don't
have a proof of Goldbach's conjecture how can he speculate on how
valuable such a proof might be? It might turn out to involve techniques
that could be applied to all sorts of other problems. It might be
fair to say, though, that Chen's work, though a great achievement, has
not led to such applications.
Robert Israel israel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: My apologies to James Harris
- Next by Date: Re: Decompsition of a linear operator.
- Previous by thread: Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution
- Next by thread: Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|