Re: does a mean vector exist?
- From: "Seán O'Leathlóbhair" <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Jun 2006 03:40:41 -0700
Jack wrote:
If I take a whole bunch of vectors and integrate them, is it possible
to
find a mean vector that approximates the "flow" of such vectors?
e.g.
XXX
XX
XX
I will get
X
X
X
Hope you understand
Thanks
Jack
Vectors can be added to each other and they can be multiplied by
scalars, so you could just calculate an average as usual: add them up
and divide (*) by the number of them. This would, in some contexts at
least, be a reasonable interpretation of their average. (*) More
precisely, if there were n vectors, multiply by 1 / n.
If you had two vectors of length 1, one pointing NE and one NW, this
average would have length ~ 0.7 and point N. Sometimes, the average
would be zero e.g. four vectors of equal lengths pointing N, E, S and
W.
--
Seán O'Leathlóbhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: does a mean vector exist?
- From: kunzmilan
- Re: does a mean vector exist?
- References:
- does a mean vector exist?
- From: Jack
- does a mean vector exist?
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?
- Next by Date: logistic map equation over Q_p
- Previous by thread: Re: does a mean vector exist?
- Next by thread: Re: does a mean vector exist?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|