? Green's func for Helmholtz eqn
- From: "Cheng Cosine" <acosine@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 01:49:54 GMT
Hi:
Given a wave eqn, many books said that by assuming soln to be
of form u(t,x,y,z) = U(x,y,z)*exp( -i*w*t ) to obtain Helmholtz eqn.
Then Green's function of 3d Helmholtz eqn are G_ = exp( -i*k*r )/4/pi/r and
G+ = exp( i*k*r )/4/pi/r. Among them, G_ is going inward, and G+ is going
outward, and thus G+ is chosen as desired solution.
My question is, can we choose u(t,x,y,z) = U(x,y,z)*exp( i*w*t ) at the
very
begining. By doing that we still have the same Helmholtz eqn, but this time,
G_ is going outward, and G+ is going inward.
Then it seems that it does not matter to pick either G_ or G+ as Green's
func
of Helmholtz eqn. Both G_ or G+ can denote outgoing wave, depending on how
we choose the temperoal part. Is this true or only G_ or G+ can denote
outgoing
wave?
Thanks,
by Cheng Cosine
Jun/06/2k6 NC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ? Green's func for Helmholtz eqn
- From: rtonyreeder
- Re: ? Green's func for Helmholtz eqn
- Prev by Date: Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring
- Previous by thread: div thm,
- Next by thread: Re: ? Green's func for Helmholtz eqn
- Index(es):