Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- From: "Abstract Dissonance" <Abstract.Dissonance@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 00:18:45 -0500
<mensanator@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149655794.335078.223960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Abstract Dissonance wrote:
For the sake of humanity please stop replying to this troll!!!!!!!!!!
This
is really pathetic.
Those who reply are performing the service of keeping
the troll placated lest he go off and get into some other
mischief such as the time he tried to vandalize the Wikipedia.
If _you_ don't like it, don't read it. But I'll not take direction
from you or anyone else.
um, I have no choice because it shows up in my newsreader. I cannot
killfile his messages because I end up getting all the replies no matter
what. I suppose I could killfile everyone that replies to him though.
And as far as "directions" are concerned... I never said you had to but
asked if you would. Did you take your chill pill today?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- From: Mike Kent
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- From: Larry Lard
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- References:
- [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- From: Abstract Dissonance
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- Prev by Date: Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices
- Previous by thread: Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- Next by thread: Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|